Monthly Archives: April 2009

82. Rockefeller and the system

Here is some wise text Tarbell rejected that view. [John Rockefeller's] importance lies not so much in the fact that he is the richest individual in the world, with the control of the property that it entails; it lies in the fact that his wealth, and the power springing from it, appeal to the most

81. The Universities in Trouble

Amazing to me how peole fail to disaggregate numbers. In this case, apportioning university costs across undergradtaues fails to recognize that the faculty are paid by research grants and very little of what a university does is directly related to undergraduate costs. At 50k per year four undergrads could hire a nobel laureeate to really

80. What Good Is Modern Finance?

Yes What Good Is Modern Finance? by Brad DeLong Modern finance exists to (i) channel purchasing power from households with savings to businesses with investment projects, (ii) improve corporate governance, and (iii) diversify risks. It has been a bust as far as (ii) and (iii) are concerned. And do we really need more than stocks and

79. Pierre Bourdieu, Tim Geithner, and Cultural Capital

This shows a new opening inthe financial discussions, brining in culture and tradition. From Baseline.. I don’t know Tim Geithner. But I have no reason to believe he is corrupt. Instead, the simplest explanation of the Times article is that he has internalized a worldview in which Wall Street is the central pillar of the American

78. The Green House of the Future

This is quite good, including Pdf files on each house. President Obama signaled the country in his speech after the North Carolina win last May that he intended to take actions to widen participation of people in the busi- ness economy. He recalled that for his own father-in-law involvement in his job was central to

77. Banks without owners are dangerous

This whole post is worth reading. The present situation, in which the government has assumed defacto ownership, through a combination of equity injections, bond guarantees, and asset purchases and guarantees, but refuses to take control, is extremely dangerous. via Economists View: Paul Krugman: Money for Nothing.

76. Dinner With David Bradley, an A-List Affair – washingtonpost.com

The need for conversation.. For more than a year, David Bradley, the Atlantic’s soft-spoken owner, has hosted these off-the-record dinners at a specially built table in his glass-enclosed office overlooking the Potomac. And the guests, from Treasury Secretary Tim Geithner to Fed Chairman Ben Bernanke to Jordan’s King Abdullah II, are as A-list as they

75. A good example of economic hype

This video is full of simple thinking that gets us in trouble. For exaple, confuses per capita averages with implication that all is well. via Alex Tabarrok on how ideas trump crises | Video on TED.com.

74. Krugman on incrasing bank salaries

More Krugman speaking sense. So what’s going on here? Why are paychecks heading for the stratosphere again? Claims that firms have to pay these salaries to retain their best people aren’t plausible: with employment in the financial sector plunging, where are those people going to go? No, the real reason financial firms are paying big

73. Krugman sees no recovery.

I think he is channeling common sense. Krugman spoke about this in Cincinnati: “I’m in the camp that really worries about the L-shaped recession. We level off but we don’t get the recovery. We hope it isn’t, but it has all the markings of it. This looks like the kind of slump that has all the